They won't release the video because it's a video of CHILDREN BEING SHOT. Jesus H. Macy. WTF.
I love how in conspiracies people can do all sorts of smart things but yet are undone by some unsung hero of the truth by doing something so stupid or basic that it's almost unbelievable... like people are smart enough to slaughter children by design, but oops, set up a webpage ahead of time.
They won't release the video because it's a video of CHILDREN BEING SHOT. Jesus H. Macy. WTF.
You don't have to do everything all by yourself.
lulz frangi GURL! you need to find something better to do with your time. a cooking class or wanking off come to mind.
okay:
If this is a hoax, 1. where have all the children magically been transported to? 2. are we to believe that the parents of the "not-really-dead" children are complicit? If so, at what reward? Just plain ol' stricter gun laws? Parents gave up their kids for stricter gun laws? 3. Why would every sector of law enforcement also be complicit? 4. Why wouldn't the Republicans jump all over this? If this were real, it's easily impeachable. Also, google time stamps are often incorrect. For a while there was one that said @ hadn't been updated since 2000. It happens. Also, what if the funding site hopped on and changed the url at the request of the user? Also, would Project Censored be all over this too?
What makes me the most upset about these jackasses who believe this conspiracy bullshit is that they have turned the death of these poor kids (and their brave teachers) into a joke. HAR HAR HAR CONSPIRACY!
Children were fucking slaughtered and all these people want to talk about are crazy theories and their overactive imaginations. It's fucking sick that we even humor them. And all we can do is laugh at them and hope they come around to reality soon... because what else can we do?
You don't have to do everything all by yourself.
So what's the theory there then? People would rather believe he used 4 hand guns to put 6-8 bullets in 20 kids instead of believing the news got it wrong, or that he brought more than one assault rifle?
Exactly. Something like this happens in every bullshit conspiracy.
Oh, and this quote from the Gawker article, by the auteur behind this video, perfectly illustrates the conspiracy nut's mindset.
Maybe because IT ACTUALLY HAPPENED THE WAY IT WAS REPORTED? Tool."When Sandy Hook first happened i just had a feeling like it was all too perfect,"
At my core, I think we're gonna be OK.
Barack Hussein Obama
once again, what difference does it make? assault rifles were bullshit BEFORE sandy hook. seriously, if it turned out he had 2 glocks and a pipe bomb...so? im still waiting for people to answer their "what if" questions......
I don't know. I suspect that they think gun-control folks used the initial reporting (that he used the rifle) to justify a ban on them and it turns out he didn't use the rifle after all. Whatever, this fierce debate should've been had after the CO movie theater shooting, but that was election time.
Exactly. That's the thing about conspiracy theorists -- it's never enough. Show them a crime scene photo and they'll want security camera footage. Show them a screen shot of the security camera footage and they'll want the actual video. Show them a clip of the footage and they'll scream that you didn't let them watch the full, unedited thing. Sometimes I think it's a gore porn fetish masquerading as concern.
We went through this with Obama's birth certificate. It was never enough. People who believe in this shit trust no one, and so they will find foul play in everything that's presented to them.
There are so many things that confuse me about the Sandy Hook conspiracy theories, but probably the biggest one is the idea that the US government would NEED TO ORGANISE A SCHOOL SHOOTING. IN AMERICA. It really is like claiming someone wanted a brewery shut down, so they formed a conspiracy to start a piss-up within it.